Eight Ways You Are Adding Hidden Toxins in Your Food

You already know that a surprising number of foods contain microplastics. Seafood is contaminated with microplastics for one.

But how you prepare, and eat your food is more important than the food itself.

Your kitchen is a top priority if you want to eliminate potential toxins and hazards to your health. Many kitchen items that you use every day, every meal, expose you to harmful chemicals.

Studies have shown that your daily intake of microplastics from food and drink is estimated to be anywhere from zero to 1.5 million microplastic particles per day.

1—You use tea bags

Those silken pyramid tea bags aren't silk. They're nylon and PET plastic.
When hit with boiling water, they shed billions of invisible plastic shards directly into your drink.

This 2019 Canadian study was the first to test nylon and polyethylene tea bags. The landmark study found that they release 11.6 billion microplastics and 3.1 billion nanoplastics directly into your cup of tea!

It depends on the exact material, temperature, brewing duration, and how you stir your tea. But that is too much detail when I just want to relax with my cup of tea.

Remember how foods such as seafood are held up as things to avoid further plastics exposure, but microplastics in so-called “filter feeders”, such as mussels, was just 0.2-0.70 microplastic particles per gram. This is far less than that 11.6 billion microplastics released when brewing a single cup of tea with a plastic tea bag!

2—You use plastic grinders

Herbs and spices come in such convenient plastic grinders, but you are also grinder plastics into your food. This study found how the grinding mechanisms made from plastic can wear down over time, releasing microplastics into ground spices.

This also sets up your pantry to always have handy herbs on hand.

3—You chew gum

Do you chew gum to freshen your breath or to reduce post-meal acid reflux?

A single gram of chewing gum can release up to 637 microplastic particles. Chewing gum is made from a gum base (plastics and rubber), to which sweeteners and flavourings are added. As you chew, the gum base releases microplastics.

Even natural gums made with plant polymers release a similar number of microplastics as the synthetic gum. This suggests that microplastics aren’t only coming from the gum base but from microplastics introduced during the production or packaging process.

4—You microwave food using plastic containers

Companies such as Rubbermaid and Tupperware make plastic storage containers without bisphenol A (BPA), well-researched for their toxic effects. But it’s hard to know exactly what chemicals are in all plastic storage containers.

Takeout containers are not usually designed for multiple uses, so definitely do not reuse them in the microwave.

Microwave-safe plastic containers might not melt, but that doesn’t mean they’re stable under heat.

Choose safe containers that have a microwave-safe symbol (usually a symbol of a microwave with a few wavy lines above it).

However, microwaves also emit EMFs, another toxin known to affect your health. Swap out your microwave for more healthful appliances.

5—You store food in plastic containers

As a mother, I understand—plastic containers are light, easy to use, and they don’t break and create (more) mess.

Plastics labeled 3 (PVC/vinyl), 6 (Polystyrene/styrofoam), and 7 (“miscellaneous plastics”, including BPA) are considered most risky. But the thing is, chemical compounds that make up plastic like to bind to fat molecules.

Choose inert materials such as glass, stainless steel and other safe metals, or porcelain and safe clay.

6—You prepare food with latex gloves

Commercial kitchens depend on latex gloves to ensure a level of hygiene and food safety, but people are starting to use at the home too?

Plastic gloves food (like the type used by service workers) worn during food handling has been found to transfer microplastics to the food too. When these disposable gloves end up in the trash, they also contribute to plastic waste and break down into more microplastics in the environment.

If you are preparing food at home for yourself, keep your hands actually clean. You’ll be cutting down a frequent use of plastic and your food might taste better, like how your mama did it.

7—You use nonstick cookware

Nonstick cookware can release PFAS (per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances), which are also known as forever chemicals if heated above 500 degrees Fahrenheit.

Don’t depend on the coating to stay perfect for long. They can get scratched, chipped, or worn down. Depending on the tools you use or how hard you go at scraping and cleaning the pan, nonstick layers will degrade.

They even emit toxic fumes that can cause polymer fume fever—causing flu-like symptoms.

Opt for ceramic pans, stainless steel or cast iron.

8—Your tools

Cooking utensils, especially those made from aluminum, copper, and lower-quality metal alloys, can leach toxic metals into food, posing serious health risks.

Cooking acidic foods, in particular, causes a heavier load of heavy metals like lead, nickel, cadmium, and chromium to leach into your food.

The Building Biology Perspective

The kitchen is central to how you feed and nourish yourself at home. Whether you are a chef who loves experimenting in the kitchen or you need to be quick and efficient in your daily eating habits, how you work in your kitchen is a big factor in whether you add or reduce common toxins to your body.

Many plastic containers and modern appliances of convenience come with specific usage and maintenance instructions, as they can otherwise leach toxic chemicals into your food. Always check the manufacturer’s directions for information if the container is safe how you use it.

If you are unsure or want to be safe, choose biologically safe materials.

Are you planning a new kitchen? Work with me to create your building biology kitchen.

Check out my guide to a tox-free kitchen with over 100 more ways to avoid hidden toxins in your food. It is free!

Why Do I Feel Dizzy All the Time?

Do you feel dizzy sometimes? For no apparent reason?

There is an important factor most overlook. EMF pollution in your environment.

There’s a real, physiological basis for why electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and radiofrequency (RF) emissions can make people feel dizzy, disoriented, or experience ringing in the ears (tinnitus).

Some doctors call it Meniere's disease, an disorder of the inner ear that causes episodes of vertigo, hearing loss, and tinnitus. They said no cure and we don’t know what causes it.

How EMFs Cause Dizziness

There are a few ways EMFs can cause dizziness.

—Vestibular and Neurological Interaction

The inner ear’s vestibular system controls balance and spatial orientation. EMFs can interact with this system in two main ways:

  1. Magneto-hydrodynamic effects. Strong electromagnetic fields can subtly move ions in the fluid of the inner ear (endolymph). They electrically conduct fluids. This can trick your brain into thinking your head is turning, causing dizziness or a sense of tilting.

  2. Electrical interference with neural firing: Neurons communicate through tiny electrical impulses (millivolt range). High-frequency or pulsed EMFs can induce microcurrents in nearby tissue, interfering with those signals—especially in areas like the cerebellum or vestibular nuclei that control equilibrium.

This is why people sometimes feel unsteady or lightheaded near powerful radar, antennas, or high-voltage installations—even without measurable heating effects.

—Cardiac and Autonomic Nervous System Response

EMFs cause tremendous amounts of oxidative stress, which is directly linked to cardiovascular disease. The autonomic nervous system (which controls involuntary functions like heart rate and blood pressure) can be affected.

EMFs can modulate vagus nerve activity, leading to momentary changes in heart rhythm, blood pressure, and respiration. This can trigger orthostatic-like symptoms—faintness, nausea, or dizziness. Your experience of your heart reacting near the array fits this category: your body’s electromagnetic control system (the heart’s sinoatrial node and vagus nerve) is incredibly sensitive to outside fields.

—Tinnitus and Microwave Auditory Effect

Some people hear a ringing or clicking sound (tinnitus-like tones).

This is an effect known as the microwave auditory or "Frey effect". Brief but intense pulses of radiofrequency (RF) energy can elicit auditory sensations when absorbed in the head of an individual. Even though the effect doesn’t involve air vibration (like normal sound), it’s perceived inside the head—exactly as many people describe when near high-powered transmitters or radar installations.

Why? Because pulse microwave radiation can cause tiny thermoelastic expansions in brain tissue, creating pressure waves that the cochlea interprets as sound. It’s been documented in military and biomedical research since the 1960s.

—Individual Sensitivity

Some people appear more electromagnetically sensitive due to genetics, pre-existing neurological patterns, or prior exposure.

The thing to understand is that biological systems have natural resonance frequencies. For example, the human brain’s EEG (electroencephalogram) rhythms range from 1–40 Hz. (It can go from delta (0-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz), which is a discussion for another article.)

The heart and cell membranes operate around low-frequency electrical potentials (tens to hundreds of millivolts).

If an external electromagnetic source happens to pulse or modulate within these ranges, it can cause entrainment or dissonance effects.

You feel it as fatigue, anxiety, confusion, or vertigo.

Arrays (e.g., long-range radar, ELF/VLF transmitters) emit wide-spectrum energy that can overlap these biological bands, especially during active experiments.

In countries such as the USA, Russia and China, they have ionospheric heaters. These powerful HF transmitter (2.8 to 10 MHz) induces controlled temporary modification to the electron temperature at desired altitude.

The U.S. operates the HAARP facility in Alaska, while Russia has the Sura Ionospheric Heating Facility, and China is reportedly building an advanced ionosphere heater in Hainan.

Other Symptoms of EHS (Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity)

Dizziness symptoms seldom come alone. More people suffer with some form of EHS (Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity).

At the same time, there is no strict standard regulating EMF pollution.

Many countries have chosen to adopt stricter exposure limits based on scientific research. Their limits are many times lower than the international standards.

Symptoms include:

  • Head pressure, dizziness, nausea

  • Ear ringing, inner vibration sensations

  • Heart palpitations or skipped beats

  • Cognitive fog or short-term confusion.

My Story

One thing that clued me in was my crazy ear ringing when I sit in my home (or my workplace) for an entire day.

When I’m out in crowded places, my hearing becomes little more than hearing my own heart beat and breathing (basically, inner ear sensations and flow). It increases when I am pregnant. These cease when I leave the location.

But when I’m out in my garden, specifically the side that faces nothing but a lovely hill, I hear absolute peace and calm.

As mentioned, all the symptoms became most apparent when I was pregnant, which is how I came across building biology. But growing up, I had never not heard a high pitched sound when it's "quiet". I thought it was normal.


Learn more about EMR.

Case Studies: Smartphones and Schwanommas

A 40-year-old Italian man had noticed the painless mass gradually expanding in his left thigh over a period of six months. Turns out it was a schwanomma cancer. It was near where he “habitually” kept his smartphone in a trouser pocket.

Three medical doctors published his diagnosis as a case report in in Radiology Case Reports, a peer-reviewed, open access journal.

This is similar to another case also in Italy.

A woman had grown a lump in her close to a pocket where she put a cell phone while doing sports for about one hour a day, every day for more than ten years.

Fiorella Belpoggi, the former scientific director of the Ramazzini Institute outside Bologna. She retired in 2019 but continues to be one of the institute’s scientific advisors. Belpoggi ran Ramazzini’s long-term RF exposure study, which found schwannoma of the heart among exposed rats.

This Ramazzini study was published in the same year as the US U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP)’s massive 10-year study that saw malignant schwannoma of the heart among its RF–exposed rats. This is what led to the now well-known conclusion that there is “clear evidence” of cancer following RF exposure.

What are Schwannomas?

Schwanommas are extremely rare and a cancer of the nervous system.

Schwann cells form the myelin sheath that insulates nerves and helps speed the conduction of electrical impulses. They are present in most organs of the body —whether of mice, rats or humans.

They are almost always benign (noncancerous) but can sometimes be malignant (cancerous)

Dr. Robert Becker Showed the Electromagnetic Keys to Health

Robert Otto Becker (May 31, 1923 − May 14, 2008) was a U.S. orthopedic surgeon and researcher in electrophysiology / electromedicine.

His work uncovered a powerful truth: our bodies respond not only chemically but electrically—and these natural electrical processes can be profoundly disrupted by man-made electromagnetic fields (EMFs).

Dr Becker was twice nominated for the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work on tissue regeneration.

As a physician, he was committed to understanding the body’s natural mechanisms. Later, he turned his focus to protecting these mechanisms.

Read more on Building Biology Home on Substack.

EMF / RF Exposure Guidelines: Understanding International, National and Regional Exposure Limits for RF-EMF

More people suffer with some form of EHS (Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity).

Federal Governments, Regional Governments and Local Governments need gain awareness and take action to lower acceptable microwave radiation exposure levels.

Most countries follow the guidelines set by the WHO’s International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) for radiofrequency electromagnetic exposure. However, these are based only on thermal effects, and completely neglects the possibility of non-thermal effects.

A growing number of countries have developed their own safety limits to be stricter and err on the side of caution, given growing evidence of harm.

EMF Exposure Guidelines  

EMF Exposure Guidelines in Singapore are under the jurisdiction of Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) who works with the National Environment Agency (NEA) to ensure radio frequency (RF) radiation safety requirements from mobile phone base stations are met in Singapore.

They do not have independently established guidelines for magnetic field or electric field exposure. They take guidance from the WHO’s International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)’s guidelines1 for RF radiation. They state that EMFs levels in Singapore are “well below the limits specified by international safety standards by the WHO”, which is 830 mG or 83,000 nT (Magnetic Field) or 5000 V/m (Electric Field) for a 24-hr period. Note that these guidelines are based on short-term acute exposure. We still do not have guidelines that protect the public from long-term low level exposure.

Based on epidemiological studies and cause-effect relationships, which are in turn based on laboratory experiments, suggest that exposure to magnetic fields and electric fields should be thousands of times lower.

In Malaysia, EMF Exposure Guidelines are under the jurisdiction of Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC). They follow the WHO’s ICNIRP.

The UK follows the WHO’s ICNIRP. National Radiological Protection Board (now absorbed into PHE) reviewed the EMF literature in 2004, stating “the results of epidemiological studies, taken individually or as collectively reviewed by expert groups cannot be used as a basis for restrictions on exposure to EMFs.”

This paper gives worldwide overview and analysis for the existing limits of human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF). Most different national and even regional governments follow the guidelines provided by the recommendations of the World Health Organisation’s International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).

International reference levels and BioInitiative Limit for exposure to RF waves, distinguishing between occupational and general public exposure. (Source: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118124)

However, many countries have chosen to adopt stricter exposure limits based on scientific research. Their limits are many times lower than the international standards.

These countries include: Canada, Austria, Italy, Poland, Switzerland, China, Russia, France, and regions of Belgium (Brussels, Flanders, Wallonia)

India reduced its allowable levels to one-tenth of previous limits based on health and environmental concerns on 1 September 2012. EMF exposure limits is under the jurisdiction of Communications & Information Technology.

In Taiwan, EMF exposure limits is under the jurisdiction of Environmental Protection Administration of the Executive Yuan, R.O.C.(Taiwan). The effective dose limit for radiation workers is set at 50 mSv per year, according to the Ionizing Radiation Protection Act. For the general public, exposure limits are generally lower and vary based on specific regulations.

In Austria, the Austrian Medical Association has developed a guideline for differential diagnosis and potential treatment of unspecific stress-related health problems associated with electrosmog.

The EU adopted the WHO-ICNIRP recommendations in its Council Recommendation of 1999 (EU-Ratsempfehlung 1999). In April 2009, a resolution of the European Parliament called for a review of the EMF limits.

Building Biology Standards for EMF / RF Exposure Limits

Building Biology recommendation are based on the precautionary principle.

Note that exposure levels accepted in many countries far exceed these guidelines as well as the recommendations of the Bioinitiative Report (prepared by a group of international scientists).

The Building Biology difference takes into account your personal environment. If several sources of risk with elevated exposure levels are identified for a single or for different standard points, the overall risk should be rated as more severe.

In 2024, Building Biology Evaluation Guidelines for Sleeping Areas underwent a thorough revision, and new tools for assessing additional indoor risk factors were introduced for some Standard points.

Building Biology guidelines: Any risk reduction is worth it. Nature is the ultimate standard.

Do you know your area’s exposure limits? Contact me.

References and Resources:

International, National and Regional exposure limits for RF-EMF. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118124

Flawed assumptions of the WHO ICNIRP RF-EMF Exposure Limits. [Download image.]

Guideline of the Austrian Medical Association for the diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses (EMF syndrome) Consensus paper. (Download).

EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. (Download.)

The ICBE-EMF 2023 paper published in the journal Environmental Health states, “the current exposure limits set by ICNIRP and FCC are based on invalid assumptions and continue to present harm to public health. (Download.)

The Bioinitiative Report. Section 4: Evidence for Inadequacy of the Standards. (Download.)

Standard of Building Biology Measurement Technology SBM 2024, including the Building Biology Evaluation Guidelines for Sleeping Areas 2024. (Download.)